Current:Home > MyA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -ProfitPioneers Hub
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-14 21:09:02
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Is Temu legit? Customers are fearful of online scams
- Friends Actor Paxton Whitehead Dead at 85
- A new bill in Florida would give the governor control of Disney's governing district
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Can Rights of Nature Laws Make a Difference? In Ecuador, They Already Are
- These formerly conjoined twins spent 134 days in the hospital in Texas. Now they're finally home.
- AbbVie's blockbuster drug Humira finally loses its 20-year, $200 billion monopoly
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- 15 Products to Keep Your Pets Safe & Cool This Summer
Ranking
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Reckoning With The NFL's Rooney Rule
- Biden calls for passage of a bill to stop 'junk fees' in travel and entertainment
- Kylie Jenner Is Not OK After This Cute Exchange With Son Aire
- Bodycam footage shows high
- It's nothing personal: On Wall Street, layoffs are a way of life
- See the Cast of Camp Rock, Then & Now
- Google shares drop $100 billion after its new AI chatbot makes a mistake
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
In the Arctic, Less Sea Ice and More Snow on Land Are Pushing Cold Extremes to Eastern North America
Kelly Osbourne Slams F--king T--t Prince Harry
A California Water Board Assures the Public that Oil Wastewater Is Safe for Irrigation, But Experts Say the Evidence Is Scant
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
A Personal Recession Toolkit
The Beigie Awards: All about inventory
Larry Birkhead Shares Rare Selfie With His and Anna Nicole Smith’s Daughter Dannielynn