Current:Home > reviewsWADA did not mishandle Chinese Olympic doping case, investigator says -ProfitPioneers Hub
WADA did not mishandle Chinese Olympic doping case, investigator says
View
Date:2025-04-13 00:35:33
The World Anti-Doping Agency did not mishandle or show favoritism in the case of 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for banned substances and were cleared to compete in the Tokyo Olympics, an independent investigation said on Tuesday.
A report by Swiss prosecutor and lead investigator Eric Cottier found there was nothing in the file to suggest WADA in any way favored the 23 swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ), a medication that increases blood flow to the heart.
The swimmers were cleared by a Chinese investigation which said they were inadvertently exposed to the drug through contamination. The report determined the swimmers were staying at a hotel where traces of TMZ were discovered in the kitchen.
WADA said it had no evidence to challenge China's findings and that external counsel had advised against appealing them.
Cottier's investigation reached a similar conclusion, finding no irregularities on the part of WADA's review of the China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) decision and that it had covered all relevant issues in determining whether or not to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
"All the elements taken into consideration by WADA, whether they come from the file produced by CHINADA with its decision or from the investigation procedures that it carried out, show the decision not to appeal to be reasonable, both from the point of view of the facts and the applicable rules," wrote Cottier in his report.
WADA has vigorously defended its handling of the Chinese case and welcomed the report which vindicates its process.
A more complete report is expected in the coming weeks and could include recommendations but WADA president Witold Banka emphasised it will not change any of the findings in the initial summary.
"... the independent prosecutor has concluded WADA showed no bias towards China and the decision not to appeal the Chinese swimming cases was undisputedly reasonable based on the evidence," Banka told Reuters. "His conclusion is very crystal clear.
"We were disgustingly accused of wrongdoing by a few individuals that there was a cover-up and that is why we found it very important to engage the independent prosecutor."
WADA doubters
The findings, however, are unlikely to satisfy WADA critics.
Travis Tygart, head of the United States Anti-Doping Agency took a pre-emptive shot on Monday at the yet to be published report calling the investigation, "more of a self-serving check the box type of exercise".
In a video message to American athletes Tygart said, that if the Cottier report does not provide answers then a U.S. backed investigation will and called for those found responsible to be held accountable.
A U.S. House of Representatives committee in May asked the Department of Justice to launch inquiries into the Chinese doping cases ahead of this year's Paris Olympics.
WADA confirmed last week it was aware the matter was being investigated by U.S. law enforcement but that the report makes clear it did nothing wrong and accused USADA of playing games.
"From the very beginning what I said is, this is the clear political game from the few individuals from the U.S. to destabilise the system and maybe to take control," said Banka.
"We treat all our stakeholders equal no matter from which country they come from. We have to be based on the rules of law and not conspiracy theories.
"We cannot accuse anyone of wrongdoing when you have no evidence, it would be the end of the anti-doping system.
"We have nothing to hide and did a good job.
"Why one country wants to take control of the anti-doping system is completely unfair and is against the harmonization of the system and very dangerous for the sporting world."
veryGood! (99)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- A big pet peeve: Soaring costs of vet care bite into owners' budgets
- Minnesota Democratic leader disavows local unit’s backing of candidate accused of stalking lawmaker
- Ex-Piston Will Bynum sentenced to 18 months in prison in NBA insurance fraud scheme
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- A close look at Israel's complex air defense system amid the attack from Iran
- I just paid my taxes. Biden's pandering on student loans will end up costing us all more.
- Kentucky prosecutor accused of trading favors for meth and sex resigns from office
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- NPR suspends editor who criticized his employer for what he calls an unquestioned liberal worldview
Ranking
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- 'Error 321': Chicago QR code mural links to 'Tortured Poets' and Taylor Swift
- Israel says Iran's missile and drone attack largely thwarted, with very little damage caused
- Caitlin Clark is No. 1 pick in WNBA draft, going to the Indiana Fever, as expected
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Citing safety, USC cancels speech by valedictorian who has publicly supported Palestinians
- CBS plans 'The Gates,' first new daytime soap in decades, about a wealthy Black family
- First 7 jurors seated in Trump trial as judge warns former president about comments
Recommendation
Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
The 10 Best Linen Pants To Rock This Summer
Mayor of North Carolina’s capital city won’t seek reelection this fall
Buffalo Sabres fire coach Don Granato after team's playoff drought hits 13 seasons
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
'All these genres living in me': Origin stories of the women on Beyoncé's 'Blackbiird'
Indiana sheriff’s deputy dies after coming into contact with power lines at car crash scene
Caitlin Clark WNBA salary, contract terms: How much will she earn as No. 1 pick?